|
|
|
| EMBARQ (EQ) |  | | Company Name: | EMBARQ | | Ticker Symbol: | EQ | | Industry: | TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS | | Company Website: | http://www.embarq.com | | Summary: Embarq (NYSE: EQ) emerged following the spin-off of Sprints Local Telephone business that became effective on May 17, 2006. Investors who held Spr...more | |
|
Company Overview and History
| Company Overview | |
Embarq (NYSE: EQ) emerged following the spin-off of Sprints Local Telephone business that became effective on May 17, 2006. Investors who held Sprint Nextel common stock on May 8, 2006, received one share of EQ stock for every 20 shares of Sprint Nextel common stock they owned. EQs assets and business now consist largely of those that comprised Sprint Nextels former Local Telecommunications Division and Sprint North Supply operations. EQ, headquartered in Overland Park, Kansas, is now the fourth largest local communications company in the United States (based on access lines) and provides services in 18 states which include many major metropolitan areas and rural markets. The customer base, market reach, competitors, network infrastructure and economics of the business vary widely among geographies. The total access lines are split even between metropolitan and rural markets. EQ derived its 2008 revenue from two operating segments Telecommunications (93%) and Logistics (7%). However, due to the sale of the Logistics operation in 1Q 2009 to KGP Telecommunications, the companys continued operation now solely comprises its Telecommunications business. EQ provides regulated local communications services as an incumbent local exchange carrier, or ILEC, to approximately 5% of U.S. households, with approximately 5.55 million access lines at the end of the most recent quarter (with consumer and business access lines representing approximately 66% and 31% of the total, respectively). Florida, North Carolina, Nevada, and Ohio territories represent approximately 66% of EQs access lines. The company also provides local voice and data, high-speed Internet (1.45 million customers as of March 31, 2009), nationwide long distance, satellite video (310,000 subscribers as of March 31, 2009) and other services to customers within EQs local service territories. Additionally, EQ provides access to its local network and other wholesale communication services for other carriers. INVESTMENT THESIS Erosion in access lines persists as the company continues to face stiff competition from wireless operators and cable companies with recent triple-play (voice, video, and data) offerings to the consumer. Currently, approximately 75% of EQs business is exposed to cable competition, reflecting a significant increase from 40% in 2005. The company s switched access lines declined 9.8% in 2008 and line losses continued in the most recent quarter (EQ lost 144,000 lines in 1Q 2009 versus 120,000 lines a year ago). Access line erosion accounted for 70% of the year-over-year decrease in voice revenue (approximately $108 million or 10.5%) for the most recent quarter. The access line loss trend is likely to continue in 2009 as cable operators offering Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) services continue to add coverage in the company s territories (approximately 80% coverage registered at the end of 2008). The challenge for the company will be to retain its subscriber level and grow revenue with new services and expansion of its geographical reach. One initiative that will attempt to offset existing service challenges is the delivery of new video services. However, EQ will face a difficult deployment process as municipality approval is required in each intended local jurisdiction before offering video to subscribers. Similar regulatory hurdles have already hindered other telephone companies, including Verizon and AT&T, deploying video broadcast services. For the past several quarters, EQ has been increasingly focused on promotional efforts for satellite TV, which the company has been marketing, in collboration with DISH Network, since 2005. The company is bundling Dish satellite TV as part of triple-play services to counter competition from cable TV operators who are estimated to control approximately 80% of all net new broadband additions in the U.S. Cable operators continue to dominate the U.S. fixed-line broadband market with nearly 55% share. Although EQ aims to boost customer growth by adding satellite TV as part of bundled offerings, the video infrastrucutre is part of Dish and, therefore, may not be capable of maximizing full margin retention that would be otherwise available from EQs own organic offering. To remain competitive and meet the customer need for high-speed, EQ needs to invest signifcantly to upgrade its infrastructure which may further strain balance sheet conditions. Although the divestiture of Sprint Nextels local telephone business (EQ) unlocked value for Sprint shareholders and the companys aggressive dividend policy (the $2.75 dividend payout equates to approximtaley 6.3% yield) will entice investors to hold shares, much of the burden is now placed on EQ in terms of financial debt and the need to turn a mature operating business into one that becomes more robust. The highly leveraged balanced sheet is an issue that should be considered. At the end of 1Q 2009, the company had approximately $5.3 billion of total long term debt and only $95 million of cash and equivalents. Lackluster performance for EQs rebranding of the Sprint Nextel MVNO wireless services has also been disappointing, forcing the company to discontinue this service. Weaker than expected cellular revenue and subscriber count led to this decision. An 8% year-over-year decline in quarterly operating revenue is partly due to the absence of wireless contribution coupled with the recent disposal of the companys Logistics business. EQ anticipates similar level of decline in revenues for the second quarter of 2009. As a result of these factors, we believe EQs cash generation and earnings power may be offset by the companys limited growth prospects and the regulatory challenges, which we believe are negative factors that may impede higher valuations.
| | Source: Zacks Investment Research |  |
|
Recent Events
Reasons to Buy EMBARQ
Investors Give Reasons to Buy
| If You Think EMBARQ Is a Buy, Post Your Reasons Below | |
Analysts Recommending Buy
Reasons to Sell EMBARQ
Investors Give Reasons to Sell
| If You Think EMBARQ Is a Sell, Post Your Reasons Below | | Bears (Negative or equivalent outlook) – 1 firm or 11.1% – Target price provided by the firm is $27.50. The firm believes that the risk-reward profile is not attractive at the current level and remains concerned about the increased competition.
| | Last edited Mon May 25, 2009 03:20 PM by SSen (Zacks Investment Research) |  |
|
Analysts Recommending Sell
| ZACKS RESEARCH | D WEISSMAN | | 1/23/2009 | SELL | | OUTLOOK We maintain our Sell rating for Embarq (EQ), the fourth largest local telephone service provider in the U.S., as access line loss continues to erode traditional voice revenue, largely resulting in decreasing consolidated sales in the last quarter (below our expectations). Line losses have been accelerated with deactivations among business customers due to weak economic conditions. EQ has received shareholder approval as well as the required state regulatory authorization for its consolidation with CenturyTel (CTL) under an $11.6 billion merger deal (expected to close in 2Q 2009). We believe that the local phone business in North America, in particular service offered by regional carriers, has significant challenges ahead as consumers and business customers migrate to alternative solutions including VoIP, wireless and cable offerings. Lower revenue forecasts for the second quarter of 2009 coupled with sustained access line losses support our thesis. We also believe pricing pressure and the need to invest further in broadband infrastructure may strain balance sheet conditions, considering EQs limited liquidity and significant debt level.
No comments yet. Be the first | | |
Reasons to Hold EMBARQ
Investors Give Reasons to Hold
| If You Think EMBARQ Is a Hold, Post Your Reasons Below | |
Analysts Recommending Hold
How Can I Decide if EMBARQ Is a Buy or a Sell?
| | How Can I Decide if EMBARQ Is a Buy or a Sell? | Follow the Experts...
| | There are 7 individual(s) in the US who know more about EMBARQ and its stock price than almost anyone else These 7 individual(s) are the 7 brokerage analysts who follow EMBARQ and whose research is discussed above by Wiki posters who receive the research from these brokerage firms To decide if you want to buy EMBARQ, you could read the discussions above and see if you find a bull or bear argument for EMBARQ that you think is compelling – or you might toss a coin. To help you evaluate the credibility of the arguments made by an analyst, we have displayed the Zacks All Star Rating of the analyst after his/her name. Zacks rates analysts as 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 STAR analysts based on the performance of their stock recommendations. The analysts with 5 STAR ratings have had the best performance. For more information on these Zacks Analyst ratings, go to http://www.zacks.com | |
|
|
...or Make Your Own Non-Consensus Decision
| | However, we believe that there is a better way to make stock selection decisions, and this Wiki is dedicated to this technique. The better way – which is taught to all MBA students, and used by professional investors – is not easy. But it is one of the few investment techniques that actually does work. The better way requires you to find errors in the consensus forecasts of revenue and EPS. Until the creation of this Wiki, it has been virtually impossible for an individual investor to develop accurate non consensus revenue and earnings forecasts because no one individual has had enough information to accurately out-forecast the Wall Street analysts.
However, by using the Wiki to pool together the collaborative intelligence of large numbers of individuals who are familiar with the TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS Industry, with EMBARQ, and with its suppliers and customers, we as a group do have a realistic chance of finding that nugget of accurate non-consensus information.
Warren Buffett finds these nuggets. This Wiki can help you find your own nuggets.
But this process can only work for those companies and industries with which you are very familiar. To apply this process to EMBARQ, you need to focus on 2 questions:- Do I agree with the consensus estimate of the future revenue of EMBARQ?
- Do I agree with the consensus estimates of the EPS of EMBARQ?
|
|
How Can I Find Errors in the Consensus Forecasts for EMBARQ?
| How Can I Find Errors in the Consensus Forecasts for EMBARQ? | The following sections are designed to help Wiki users identify errors in the consensus revenue forecasts for the major EMBARQ products. Below each consensus revenue forecast is a Wiki section reserved for users to discuss why these consensus forecasts may be high or low.
All consensus forecasts are provided by Zacks Investment Research. |
|
Data – Consensus Forecasts of Data Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $657.00 |
$714.60 |
$765.00 |
$801.00 |
$807.40 |
$833.60 |
$822.30 |
3.8% |
|
Internet – Consensus Forecasts of Internet Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $310.00 |
$396.40 |
$489.00 |
$549.00 |
$584.50 |
$610.50 |
$635.00 |
12.7% |
|
Wireless – Consensus Forecasts of Wireless Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/06 |
| $7.00 |
$51.00 |
$58.00 |
$25.50 |
$13.50 |
$9.10 |
5.4% |
|
Other Service Revenue – Consensus Forecasts of Other Service Revenue Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $334.00 |
$250.80 |
$243.00 |
$246.00 |
$228.90 |
$227.30 |
$225.90 |
-6.3% |
|
Total Service Revenue – Consensus Forecasts of Total Service Revenue Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $5,566.00 |
$5,855.10 |
$5,786.00 |
$5,569.00 |
$5,174.00 |
$4,835.10 |
$4,552.20 |
-3.3% |
|
Logistics – Consensus Forecasts of Logistics Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
10/05 |
| $563.00 |
$530.00 |
$466.00 |
$435.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
-100.0% |
|
Product Revenue – Consensus Forecasts of Product Revenue Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $125.00 |
$106.60 |
$113.00 |
$120.00 |
$107.40 |
$103.10 |
$98.70 |
-3.9% |
|
Total Product Revenue – Consensus Forecasts of Total Product Revenue Revenue in Millions
|
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| $688.00 |
$622.30 |
$579.00 |
$555.00 |
$107.40 |
$103.10 |
$103.30 |
-27.1% |
|
EPS FORECASTS
This section is designed to find errors as the consensus forecast of EPS. The consensus forecasts for the lines in the EMBARQ Income Statement are shown and below each consensus forecast is a wiki section to discuss why the consensus forecast of that item may be high or low
Consensus Forecasts of Total Revenue
|
| |
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
11/05 |
| 1. Total Revenue |
$6,573.30 |
$6,493.60 |
$6,365.00 |
$6,124.00 |
$4,864.60 |
$4,440.50 |
$4,100.50 |
-7.6% |
|
| Discussion by Wiki Users | Revenue is expected to decline at a similar or slightly lower rate than the first quarter. We expect continued access line erosion to impact revenue. The company expects net capital expenditure for second quarter to increase sequentially but to remain lower than the prior-year quarter level. Revenue levels in consensus reflect the removal of Embarq's Logistic unit. EQ will be merging with CTL.
| Last edited Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:26 AM by Dweissman (Individual Investor) |  |
Consensus Forecasts of Cost of Goods Sold
|
| |
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
| 2. Cost of Goods Sold |
$2,320.00 |
$2,249.00 |
$2,188.30 |
$2,051.00 |
$1,505.20 |
$1,477.00 |
$1,398.30 |
| Percent of Revenue |
35% |
35% |
34% |
33% |
31% |
33% |
34% |
| 3. Gross Profit (1-2) |
$4,253.30 |
$4,244.60 |
$4,176.70 |
$4,073.00 |
$3,359.40 |
$2,963.50 |
$2,702.20 |
| Percent of Revenue |
65% |
65% |
66% |
67% |
69% |
67% |
66% |
|
Consensus Forecasts of Tax provisions
|
| |
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
| 8. Tax provisions |
$523.00 |
$443.70 |
$397.90 |
$462.90 |
$401.50 |
$323.40 |
$267.80 |
| Net Income |
$833.80 |
$773.30 |
$693.50 |
$772.40 |
$674.40 |
$545.50 |
$450.50 |
|
Consensus Forecasts of Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding
|
| |
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
| Fully Diluted Shares Outstanding |
$150.20 |
$150.40 |
$154.00 |
$147.40 |
$144.50 |
$144.80 |
$145.20 |
|
Consensus Forecasts of GAAP EPS
|
| |
Dec-05 |
Dec-06 |
Dec-07 |
Dec-08 |
Dec-09 |
Dec-10 |
Dec-11 |
| GAAP EPS |
$5.54 |
$5.26 |
$4.44 |
$5.21 |
$4.66 |
$4.03 |
$3.10 |
|
| Discussion by Wiki Users | In view of its upcoming merger with CTL, EQ has provided financial guidance for the second quarter of 2009. Cash flow before dividends is projected to be above the prior-year quarter level and we believe EPS will be above consensus estimates for 2009, pre-merger with CTL.
| Last edited Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:25 AM by Dweissman (Individual Investor) |  |
What if I Agree with Consensus Forecasts?
| What if I Agree with Consensus Forecasts? | You Can Still Make an Effective Investment Decision
| | If you agree with the above consensus forecasts of revenue and of EPS, you can still make an effective investment decision by determining that a relative valuation metric is out of line. Perhaps because of events taking place in the industry, or with other companies, you may feel that EMBARQ is either undervalued or overvalued, should the consensus estimates of revenue and EPS be realized. This section of the Wiki helps you think about valuation by comparing EMBARQ to some of its peers using a number of standard relative valuation metrics. This section also includes a simple discounted cash flow model for EMBARQ based on the consensus forecasts. The following table should be your starting point. This shows P/E, P/Sales, and P/Cash Flow for EMBARQ and for comparable companies. |
|
|
| EQ (EMBARQ) |
$5,899.00 |
$731.00 |
469.7% |
-3% |
8.17 |
1.0 |
3.4 |
Industry Mean |
|
|
2% |
7% |
12.26 |
1.9 |
2.7 |
| S&P 500 |
|
|
39% |
11% |
15.87
| 1.5 |
9.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBB (CINCINNATI BELL) |
$1,380.00 |
$118.50 |
|
4% |
6.79 |
0.4 |
2.5 |
Q (QWEST COMM INTL) |
$13,249.00 |
$730.00 |
155.7% |
2% |
10.55 |
0.5 |
2.2 |
S (SPRINT NEXTEL) |
$34,510.00 |
($2,885.00) |
1.0% |
13% |
|
0.4 |
1.6 |
CF is operating cash flow plus after-tax interest expense. |
|
| Discussion by Wiki Users of Relative Valuation | | No comments yet. Be the first | |  |
Dividend Discount Model for EMBARQ
| | The two major techniques used by fundamental analysts to evaluate the value of a stock are the relative valuation metrics such as PE discussed above and the dividend discount model (DDM) or discounted cash flow model (DCF). More information about these valuation-related topics is available here. This reference answers most of the questions investors have when they first encounter these discount approaches to determining value, such as: - What is the discount rate?
- Why does the DDM discount earnings and not dividends?
- How can I use a DDM if the company does not pay dividends?
- How do I set the terminal value? (applies only to DCF)
- How do I calculate cash flow to use the DCF model?
|
|
What Do Insiders and Institutional Owners Say about EMBARQ?
| Insiders and Institutional Owners Discuss Issues Here | | No comments yet. Be the first | |  |
|
Industry Analysis
Industry Outlook for Major TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS Companies
| adad sad sad saZacks.com Telecom Outlook
Posted Fri Oct 17, 04:48 pm ET
Posted By: David Weissman, CFA
Dismal economic events have culminated in drastic declines of market valuation among companies in nearly every industry/sector, including impacts to telecom industry performance. Capital spending constraints among carriers, and limited funds available to sustain (grow) telecom services over the next six- to twelve-months, may be outcomes of credit markets remaining restricted and overall GDP growth remaining tepid or even retracting.
Telecom carriers often resort to credit markets for funding capital projects, while telecom equipment companies conventionally use equity share offerings in lieu of debt instruments. The outcome has been a disappointment, regardless of the selected financing mechanism.
As a result of weakening macroeconomic indicators, telecom carriers’ capital expenditures remain limited in 2008 and early 2009. There remains to be more selectivity on technology choices and leveraging cost-savings synergies, such as streamlining purchasing arrangements and reducing the number of preferred vendors. Shareholders continue to foster an environment where executives are held accountable to focus more on balance sheet improvements, financial discipline, and improving free cash flow.
Telecom carriers and equipment providers that offer the most attractive opportunities are focused on third-generation (3G) wireless, broadband (DSL) and fiber-to-the-home/node networking. There are also a few market leaders that have proven able to survive the sometimes turbulent opportunity swings in the industry. It is our belief that in this uncertain stage of macroeconomic events, companies with strong balance sheets and firm net cash positions, along with sustainable dividends, provide respectable risk/reward profiles. On the other hand, highly leveraged companies should be avoided, at least at this economic juncture.
Opportunities
The transient collapse of financial markets has become an indelible lesson to many of us. With this we have witnessed that sector diversity is a less secure planning tool in today’s increasingly correlated world markets. However, there are some tactics and opportunities that may be appropriate to address the downturns in the telecom industry, should we be greeted with them again. We consider the following:
Necessity for Telecommunications — The need for telecom in both rural and urban areas, and its role in the infrastructure of both developed and developing markets, continues to grow. Wireless infrastructures and/or low-cost integrated IP voice and data wireline networks are necessities. In fact, most global subscribers will not give up their wireless phones and services that easily, although upgrades to advanced (high-end) handsets/offerings may be sensitive to overall consumer/business budgets. This is accompanied by telecom carriers’ continued quest for operational flexibility and streamlining.
International Diversification — While country diversification offers only limited protection in the current highly-correlated world equity markets, it offers hedging capabilities from local economic weakness and associated currency exchange differentials. Therefore, a significant allocation of foreign telecom companies would be appropriate as part of a technology-focused portfolio.
Balance Sheet Positions — In our view, companies showing significant net cash positions become attractive in volatile markets. It is important to consider balance sheet conditions that may limit the vulnerability of telecom companies in weak economies. This is perhaps at least as important as metrics that track earnings growth but often do not consider overall market declines. With the S&P 500 P/E between 10 and 12 times earnings, valuation targets that were provided by analysts based on earnings growth parameters have not been effective in guiding investment recommendations during market tailspins.
This leads us to recommend selected net cash positive companies able to weather financial market volatility. Companies that match well with the aforementioned considerations include Qualcomm (QCOM), China Mobile (CHL), Amdocs (DOX) and Chunghwa Telecom (CHT). These entities have significant cash and each has unique exposure to wireless and international business, along with strong balance sheet positions to sustain their expansions.
Other investment strategies to consider for telecom include:
Investing in Dividend-Yielding Companies — Telecom service companies typically provide a disciplined return to investors over time with dividend payouts. Dividend payouts of many of the larger telecom service companies are yielding an average of 4 to 9% as stock prices reached their lower levels. When considering dividend rates, however, we emphasize the need to review company liquidity, debt levels and cash flow conditions that permit their ability to pay debt obligations.
Dollar Cost Averaging — Setting aside funds to spread out industry specific investments over time represents a sound strategy. This can leverage lower valuations for better investment returns when market values improve over the longer time horizon.
Weaknesses
Generally, telecom companies that have exhibited significant degrees of valuation decline have had high debt levels and large financial leverage ratios. These companies, while offering recurring cash flow to service their debt obligations, may have difficulties should overall business decline as consumers and businesses become more selective with their spending behavior. Risks that still remain include the following:
Potential Business Slowdown -- Lower overall top-line sales among carriers that would justify a proportional reduction in capital expenditures.
Exacerbated Borrowing with Credit and Loans — Over the near-term, telecom companies may be exposed to high debt levels and limited liquidity.
Economic Impact Straining Consumer and Business Spending — Telecom companies that would have free cash flow impacted by slowdown in demand. (Sustainable cash flow is required to service debt obligations and may be severely impacted by pessimistic business projections.)
| Last edited Tue Oct 28, 2008 01:08 PM by NikhilTorsekar (Portfolio Manager / Buy-Side Analyst) |  |
|
|
EMBARQ Role in the TELECOMMUNICATIONS SVCS Industry
| adad sad sad sa
| |  |
|
Company Specific Investment Issues
The issues discussed in the sections below generally comprise the bulk of the content in a typical research report. Understanding these subjects is certainly important when making an investment decision for EMBARQ. However, to provide the most value to Wiki users as you read and contribute to these discussions, please try and tie your comments back to their specific impact on forecasts of future Revenue, Net Income, EPS, or Cash Flow.
| Discussion about Capital Structure / Solvency / Cash Flows Issues | | No comments yet. Be the first | |  |
|
| Discussion about Governance / Social Responsibility / Treatment of Employees | | No comments yet. Be the first | |  |
|
| Acquisitions/Divestures/Joint Ventures/Hot New Products/Exciting Opportunities | | CTL to acquire EQ
The Company expects to receive the remaining 5 state approvals and FCC approval for the CTL merger in 2Q09.
On March 31, 2009, CTL and EMBARQ (NYSE: EQ) announced that CenturyTel’s pending acquisition of EMBARQ received approval from the Florida and Louisiana Public Service Commissions and the Illinois Commerce Commission. Florida, Illinois and Louisiana join Georgia, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska and Ohio, where approval of the merger was previously announced.
On January 27, 2009, CenturyTel (NYSE: CTL) and EMBARQ announced that shareholders of both companies have approved all proposals related to the CenturyTel/EMBARQ merger. All of the vote results have been certified by the independent inspector of elections at each Company's special meeting of shareholders.
Earlier on October 27, 2008, CenturyTel, Inc. (CTL) and Embarq Corporation (EQ) announced a definitive agreement under which CTL will acquire EQ in a tax free, stock-for-stock transaction creating one of the leading communications companies in the United States.
Under the terms of the agreement, EQ shareholders will receive 1.37 CTL shares for each share of EQ common stock they own. The consideration will be worth $40.42 based on CTL’s closing price on October 24, 2008, representing a premium to EQ shareholders of approximately 36.0% over the Company’s closing stock price on October 24, 2008. The transaction reflects an enterprise value of approximately $11.6 billion, including the assumption of $5.8 billion of EQ’s debt. Upon closing of the transaction, EQ shareholders are expected to own approximately 66.0% and CTL shareholders are expected to own approximately 34.0% of the combined company. The parties expect the transaction to be accretive to CTL's free cash flow per share in 2010, the first full year following the expected closing.
KGP Telecommunications, Inc. to Purchase EMBARQ Logistics(TM)
On March 11, 2009, KGP Telecommunications, Inc., announced the completion of its acquisition of EMBARQ Logistics, the supply chain, distribution and deployment subsidiary of Embarq Corporation (EQ). The name of the company will be KGP Logistics. Terms of the sale were not released.
On January 29, 2009, EQ announced it has agreed to sell its supply chain, distribution and deployment subsidiary known as EMBARQ Logistics(TM) to KGP Telecommunications, Inc. KGP, based in Faribault, Minn., is a leading provider of supply chain services, telecommunication products and integrated solutions. The consummation of the transaction is subject to customary closing conditions and completion of financing arrangements.
As part of the transaction, KGP will provide certain logistics and supply chain services for EMBARQ's core telecommunications operation under a long-term commercial services agreement
| Last edited Mon May 25, 2009 03:23 PM by SSen (Zacks Investment Research) |  |
|
| Discussion about Upcoming Events to Watch for That Will Impact Stock Price | | On August 6, 2009, EQ will likely announce its 2Q09 earnings results.
| Last edited Mon May 25, 2009 03:23 PM by SSen (Zacks Investment Research) |  |
|
Created by: WikiMigrationBot.
Last Modification: Wednesday 24 of June, 2009 15:29:50 CDT by WikiMigrationBot.
|